Tag Archives: Public Space

CyNUM’s 2nd Regional Urban Morphology Conference

 

Conference Brief
CyNUM’s 2nd Regional Urban Morphology Conference aims to establish a common platform to discuss further how cities, in the
context of the south-eastern Mediterranean, transform over time by concentrating on their urban morphological characteristics.
The conference sets up an academic and professional arena in which urban morphology would be explored through heritage
conservation-based urban transformation, regeneration-based urban transformation, and (re)development-based urban
transformation within the rich urban context of south-eastern Mediterranean cities. The sub-themes of the conference are as follows:
• Transformation of Urban Form
• Architecture, Heritage and Urban Form
• Conservation of Urban Landscape
• Public Space Network

Organising Committee (Alphabetic Order)
Gizem Caner, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Fine Arts, Design and Architecture, Cyprus International University
Alessandro Camiz, Associate Prof., Department of Architecture, Ozyegin University
Nevter Zafer Cömert, Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University.
Ilaria Geddes, Researcher, Department of Architecture, University of Cyprus
Şebnem Önal Hoşkara, Professor, Department of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University (Conference Chair)
Nezire Ozgece, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Fine Arts, Design and Architecture, Cyprus International University

Scientific Committee (Alphabetic Order)
Ali Alraouf, HBKU University, Doha, Qatar
Cana Bilsel, Middle East Technical University, Turkey
Olgu Çalışkan, Middle East Technical University, Turkey
Naciye Doratlı, Eastern Mediterranean University, Cyprus
Sergio Garcia Perez, University of Zaragoza
Payam Mahasti, Cyprus International University, Cyprus
Marco Maretto, University of Parma & Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Ayşe Sema Kubat, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey.
Giuseppe Strappa, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Tolga Ünlü, Çukurova University, Turkay
Malgorzata Hanzl, Lodz University of Technology, Poland

 

fragmental_ on the dissolution of public space

fragmental_on the dissolution of public space

Villa Massimo in Rome –  24th and 25th of February 2022

 

 

 

Participants
Verena von Beckerath – BAUHAUS-UNIVERSITÄT Weimar
Emanuel Christ & Christoph Gantenbein – ETH Zürich
Filip Dujardin – Ghent
Job fForis – MONADNOCK Rotterdam
Simona Malvezzi – KÜHN MALVEZZI Berlin
Oda Pälmke – TU Kaiserslautern
Marco Provinciali – SUPERVOID Rom
Uwe Schröder – RWTH Aachen
Giuseppe Strappa – SAPIENZA Università di Roma
Andrea Simitch & Val Warke – CORNELL University New York
Imke Woelk – IMKEWOELK + Partner Berlin
Peter L. Wilson – BOLLES+WILSON Münster
Moderated by Adria Daraban and Heike Hanada
Final lecture with guest of honour
RACHEL WHITEREAD – London

„ The Greek law was really a „wall of law“ and as such created the space of a polis; without this wall there could be a city in the sense of a collection of houses for people to live together (an „asty“), but no „polis“, no city-state as a political community. The wall of the law was sacred, but not itself, on what it enclosed was actually political.“
Hannah Arendt „Der Raum des Öffentlichen und der Bereich des Privaten“ Chicago 1958

Rome forms the foundation of a basic understanding of the identity and heritage of European architecture. Its ruinous monumentality* is still more visibly present today for the city, for architecture and art than perhaps in no other metropolis in Europe.
As a thematic follow-up to the symposium „monumental_public buildings at the beginning of the 21st century“ 2019 at the Baukunstarchiv NRW, the theme of „fragmental_dissolution of public space“ at the 2022 symposium at the Villa Massimo in Rome examines the ambivalent identity of a monumental and simultaneously romantic understanding of space between the built environment and its dissolution, between architecture and the reconquest of space by nature. At a time when our relationship to the unbuilt, to the „natural“ is being radically questioned and the static role of architecture is beginning to falter, concepts such as dissolution and fragmentation seem to be taking on a new identity forming role in recent architectural development. But how does
the relationship between architecture and the city develop?
The symposium seeks to take up the concept of the „public“ within recent positions and to critically reflect on its relation to a classical-romantic understanding of architecture.
24th and 25th of February 2022

CONTACT
Chair of Building Typologies
Prof. Heike Hanada | heike.hanada@tu-dortmund.de

Ayse Sema Kubat – MORPHOGENETIC SURVEY ON THE TRANSFORMATION OF A POLITICAL CENTER TO A TRANSPORTATION HUB: TAKSIM & GEZI PARK, ISTANBUL

 

Ayşe Sema Kubat  ITU Istanbul Technical University

MORPHOGENETIC SURVEY ON THE TRANSFORMATION OF A POLITICAL CENTER TO A TRANSPORTATION HUB: TAKSIM & GEZI PARK, ISTANBUL

The presentation aims to contribute to further the knowledge about design/planning interventions in central public spaces and how these may affect on the morphological structure of a city through movement and vitality. This presentation provides a comparative analysis through a quantitative method, of a major urban design intervention that was implemented in Taksim Square in İstanbul.Taksim Square and Gezi Park, have been one of the unique places to study social and spatial layout change throughout the history. Taksim as a political and social beating heart of Istanbul, it has been the subject of a never-ending cycle about urban design decisions. Currently the underground tunnel system is open to traffic and pedestrianized Taksim square, which is a vast concrete space awaits for an urban design project since 2013. In March 2020, Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, declared a contest for an urban design project in Taksim. Between 146 applications, only 3 projects were allocated design equivalent awards. These three projects are unique in their space production with different urban design solutions. The question is; would it be possible to change the fate of the square and its close environment with the proposals of the winner project, and how about the other two in this manner?