Category Archives: LAB 2

TERRITORY AS ARCHITECTURE

TERRITORY AS ARCHITECTURE

Giuseppe Strappa

 

 

 

 

Early formation of Pienza (from Cataldi)

 

Territory is materia signata, a substance which man’s consciousness acknowledges as having an aptitude for transformation: architectural material in the most complete sense of the word.[1]

Therefore, use of the natural matter, of the soil bed in its different, complementary meanings related to vegetal or geological world, lies at the origin of the formation of the territory. So, its study is linked to the architectural interpretation of a process, to the problem of how matter becomes material before being transformed into a territorial element and how each element arising from this transformation contributes to the formation of a more general “territorial organism” comprising increasingly higher-level structures.

Land-scape means in English “modelling of the earth”, with an  emphasis on the natural aspect of the cognitive environment the term is associated with. It is opposed to the italian term “paesaggio” (French paesage , Spanish paisaje) associated with the term “paese” and hence to the Latin pagus meaning village, acknowledging, in a concise manner, a relationship of solidarity between the land and human settlement.

Therefore, the landscape as a cultural expression is linked to the inhabited space, to the cooperation between natural and artificial resources, to the transformations that interpret the form of orographic peaks, valleys, plains and their ability to become a built environment. In short, it is the territory’s visible aspect, the concise expression of its structure. ………………………

click here to continue reading        cap. 10 territorio per il corso  

LEARNED LANGUAGE / EVERYDAY LANGUAGE

Translated from  G.Strappa , Architettura come processo, Franco Angeli, Milano 2015

Chapter 5.  LEARNED LANGUAGE / EVERYDAY LANGUAGE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5a – The modern idea of a masonry language, both local and international, was born with the decline of the consolidated stereotype of a Mediterranean landscape that painters and poets had for a long time idealized in the transparent airiness of colonnades and trabeations used in basically trilithic structures, of wooden derivation.

This landscape, instead, reveals to the travelers, when the geographical and cultural barrier of Rome is overcome, its own nature of plastic, organically man-made territory. It consists of churches, monasteries, even ancient ruins, but above all of urban fabrics of great massive strength. A world of powerful walls and houses with small windows, organized in solid and continuous volumes.

The other side of classicism was also discovered: that of the large uninterrupted walls, where the openings are simple flat-arched holes that don’t interrupt their architectural continuity. Reality begins to shake off, in the European imagination, the aristocratic museum of literary representations which, on the basis of the classic tradition, had superimposed itself on the truth of the built landscape……..

click to continue reading   5. Chap. 5 Translation from -Architettura come processo-

LECTURE 6 – SPECIAL NODAL BUILDING AND KNOTTING PROCESS

GIUSEPPE STRAPPA

SPECIAL NODAL BUILDING AND KNOTTING PROCESS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LECT. 7 B SPECIAL nodal and knotting – pres. person.

The nodal special building is the part of the urban fabric characterized by a central structure  organically hierarchized in relation to the others

This central structures are, from the point of view:

STATIC              brought, compared to other load bearing (collaborating)

DISTRIBUTIVE   served, compared to other serving

SPATIAL               nodal, compared to other serial